Coleen Rooney’s legal professionals have dragged Rebekah Vardy’s scandalous kiss and inform about Peter Andre into their libel battle.
The authorized workforce representing Wayne Rooney’s spouse, 34, have filed new papers as a part of the authorized battle with Rebekah, 38, after she sued Coleen for libel over their Wagatha Christie row.
Coleen sensationally accused Rebekah’s account of leaking tales to the press from her personal Instagram account – a declare which Jamie Vardy’s spouse vehemently denies.
In newly-filed paperwork, Coleen’s workforce accuse Rebekah of getting type for placing personal info into the general public area about different celebrities.
They reference her sensational 2001 interview with the Information Of The World, wherein Rebekah described an evening of ardour with pop star Peter Andre earlier than she married footballer Jamie.
(Picture: Getty Photographs)
The papers state: “Within the interview, the Claimant disclosed amongst different issues that (i) she had sexual activity with Peter Andre in November 2001, and that it lasted simply 5 minutes…
“(ii) Peter Andre had ‘the smallest trouser tools I’ve ever seen’ that was ‘like a miniature chipolata’…
“(iii) that he ‘had completely no hairs on his physique’; and (iv) he ‘slaver[ed]’ like certainly one of her boxer canine when he kissed her.”
Peter Andre has by no means publicly addressed the feedback made by Rebekah within the Information of the World interview.
(Picture: PA)
The paperwork additionally informed how Rebekah labored for The Solar to supply a ‘behind the scenes’ video on the Nationwide Tv Awards in 2018.
The papers allege that on the awards ceremony, Rebekah was accused by former Ladies Aloud star Sarah Harding of taking intrusive pictures of her with out her consent.
In one other excerpt, Coleen’s legal professionals model Rebekah “publicity in search of” and accuse her of intentionally sitting behind Wayne’s spouse at a footie match to “assure her look within the media”.
The papers state: “Amongst her different publicity in search of behaviour, the Claimant [Vardy] sat behind the Defendant [Rooney] on the match of 16 June 2016, in order that she would assure her look within the media…
“The Claimant refused to sit down in her allotted seats within the circumstances beneath, as a substitute selecting to sit down by the Defendant.
(Picture: Day by day Mirror)
“All the seats allotted to the Claimant had been a number of rows behind the place she truly selected to sit down.
“The rows instantly behind the Defendant, the place the Claimant and her company sat, had been in actual fact reserved for Soccer Affiliation (“FA”) safety.
“Ten minutes earlier than the beginning of the match, the FA Liaison Officer informed members of the Claimant’s occasion that they weren’t sitting within the right seats and that the seats they had been sitting in had been particularly reserved for FA safety.
“They had been requested to maneuver. The Claimant’s company refused and had been abusive to the liaison officer.
“Because of this, FA safety had been compelled to sit down elsewhere.”
(Picture: SplashNews.com)
Final yr, Coleen sensationally accused Rebekah’s account of being behind tales that had been leaked from her personal account – incomes her the nickname Wagatha Christie for her on-line sleuthing.
She arrange her personal sting operation to catch whoever had been passing on info from her personal web page to the press.
She posted a sequence of pretend tales, blocked all her followers other than Rebekah’s account after which sprung a gotcha submit on-line when the hoax posts made their approach into the papers.
Rebekah vehemently denied she was behind the leaks, insisting a lot of folks had entry to her Instagram web page.
(Picture: ITV)
After Coleen’s submit final October, Rebekah launched an announcement to strenuously deny she was behind the leak.
Rebekah wrote: “I want you had referred to as me in case you thought this.
“I by no means converse to anybody about you as varied journalists who’ve requested me to over time can vouch for.
“I am not being humorous however I do not want the cash, what would I acquire from promoting tales on you?…
“I appreciated you a large number Coleen & I am so upset that you’ve got chosen to do that.”
